Giỏ hàng của bạn

The race to net zero emissions: carbon neutral target of countries

Time is running out to talk about Net Zero goals. In April 2021 at US Climate Summit, US President Joe Biden urged countries to accelerate carbon neutrality commitments or make commitments. This is a continuation of the Paris Agreement, which committed signatories to carbon neutrality in the second half of the 21st century. But 2050-2100 is a wide timeframe and climate change is becoming widespread and scary than. So when do countries commit to Net Zero and how serious are they about their commitments? 

Timeline of countries on carbon neutrality goals

The first question is How many countries are trying to achieve net zero emissions, and how fast? 137 countries have committed to carbon neutrality, as tracked by energy and climate intelligence and confirmed in commitments to the Carbon Neutral Alliance and recent policy statements by governments. The earlier the commitments, the better, and most of them are focused around 2050.

STTQUỐC GIANĂM MỤC TIÊU
1Bhutanachieve
2Surinamachieve
3Uruguay2030
4Finland2035
5Austria2040
6Iceland2040
7Germany2045
8Sweden2045
9Afghanistan2050
10Andorra2050
11Angola2050
12Antigua and Barbuda2050
13Argentina2050
14Armenia2050
15Bahamas2050
16Bangladesh2050
17Barbados2050
18Belgium2050
19Belize2050
20Benin2050
21Brazil2050
22Bulgaria2050
23Burkina Faso2050
24Burundi2050
25cape verde2050
26Cambodia2050
27Canada2050
28central african republic2050
29Chad2050
30Chile2050
31Colombia2050
32Comoros2050
33Island2050
34costa rica2050
35Croatia2050
36Cyprus2050
37Czech2050
38Democratic Republic of the Congo2050
39Denmark2050
40Djibouti2050
41Dominica2050
42Dominican Republic2050
43Ecuador2050
44Eritrea2050
45Estonia2050
46Ethiopia2050
47European Union2050
48Fiji2050
49France2050
50Gambia2050
51Greece2050
52Greneda2050
53Guinea2050
54Guinea-Bissau2050
55Guyana2050
56Haiti2050
57Hungary2050
58Ireland2050
59Italy2050
60jamaica2050
61Japan2050
62Kiribati2050
63Laos2050
64Latvia2050
65lebanon2050
66Lesotho2050
67Liberia2050
68Lithuania2050
69Luxembourg2050
70madagascar2050
71Malawi2050
72Maldives2050
73Mali2050
74malta2050
75Marshall Islands2050
76mauritania2050
77Mauritius2050
78Mexico2050
79Micronesia2050
80Monaco2050
81Mozambique2050
82Myanmar2050
83Namibia2050
84Nauru2050
85Nepal2050
86Netherlands2050
87New Zealand2050
88Nicaragua2050
89Niger2050
90Niue2050
91Norway2050
92Pakistan2050
93Palau2050
94Panama2050
95papua new guinea2050
96Paraguay2050
97Peru2050
98Portugal2050
99Romania2050
100Rwanda2050
101Saint Kitts and Nevis2050
102saint lucia2050
103Saint Vincent and the Grenadines2050
104Samoa2050
105sao tome and principe2050
106Senegal2050
107Seychelles2050
108Sierra Leone2050
109Slovakia2050
110slovenia2050
111solomon islands2050
112somalia2050
113South Africa2050
114South Korea2050
115South Sudan2050
116Spain2050
117Sudan2050
118Switzerland2050
119Tanzania2050
120East Timor2050
121togo2050
122Tonga2050
123Trinidad and Tobago2050
124Tuvalu2050
125us2050
126Uganda2050
127U.K.2050
128Uzbekistan2050
129Vanuatu2050
130vatican city2050
131Yemen2050
132Zambia2050
133China2060
134Kazakhstan2060
135Ukraine2060
136Australia2050 – 2100
137Singapore2050 – 2100
 
In terms of early adopter countries, Bhutan and Suriname are two the only country to achieve carbon neutrality and actually be carbon negative (remove more carbon than it emits). Uruguay 2030 target is the first to be achieved This feat, followed by Finland, Austria, Iceland, Germany and Sweden in Europe, all aim for 2045 or sooner.

More than 90%, or 124 of the 137 countries followed following above, has set a target of becoming carbon neutral by 2050. This is largely thanks to membership in the Carbon Neutral Alliance, which requires member states to set a target by 2050 but still keep their own commitments.

Only five countries have committed to net zero emissions after 2050, including Australia and Singapore, the remaining countries have not yet set targets  clearly. Aim for 2060, in addition to Ukraine and Kazakhstan, also includes China, the world's largest emitter. China's recent commitment is significant, as the country accounts for about 25% of global emissions. In fact, according to Climate Action Tracker, 73% of global emissions are now being included in net-zero emissions targets.

Countries taking their pledges to carbon neutrality are so serious that Which?

Setting a goal is perhaps the easiest step to achieving carbon neutrality. But the real challenge lies in solidifying that goal and starting to make progress toward it. That's why it's important to consider how committed each country is to its carbon neutrality pledge. The strictest commitments are set out in law, followed by official government policy, although the latter are subject to change with the government. Similarly, proposed legislation shows momentum to make commitments a reality, but proposals can take a long time to take effect (or go off the rails). It turns out that the majority of carbon neutrality targets are only being discussed and no formal action has been taken to act on them. Uruguay's 2030 target could be the earliest, but it has not yet been set. The earliest commitment actually enshrined in law is Sweden's 2045 target. Only six countries, including Sweden, have put carbon neutrality targets into law. These include Denmark, France, Hungary, New Zealand and United Kingdom. Five other countries have proposed legislation, including Canada and South Korea, as well as the European Union as a whole. Meanwhile, 24 countries have introduced official policies on climate targets. These include Brazil, China, Germany and the United States, some of the world's largest emitters.

99 of the 137 commitments, equivalent to more 72%, are in discussion stage. This means they now have no official status and are more difficult to act on. But over time, pressure on countries to meet their carbon neutrality commitments began to increase.

economic depression. Malnutrition rates will increase and threaten society. 

 

Concepts and technology options for agriculture adapting to climate change

Agriculture is the basic industry of the national economy, food security is the foundation of social stability and national security, agriculture adapting to climate change becomes a priority. leading priority. Currently, many independent adaptation plans have been implemented around the world in different regions, different industries and at different levels. As an industry "Depending on the weather", agricultural workers have also independently applied a number of adaptation plans to seek advantages and avoid disadvantages. But in general, the scale of global agricultural adaptation with Current climate change is not enough to support the sustainable development of agriculture and the realization of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, nor is it enough to fully offset the negative impacts. The potential of climate change for crops. production. Many scientific and feasible adaptation plans implemented in various regions of the world still lack effective economic incentives or relevant policy support. Therefore , how to motivate businesses and agricultural workers to implement more effective adaptation measures is an important issue facing policymakers today.

With With the development of the concept of ecosystem services, the international community has gradually recognized the role of ecosystems in climate adaptation. The concept of "Ecosystem-based adaptation (EbA)" was created to enhance the adaptive capacity of communities and reduce the pressure of climate change on ecosystems by managing and restoring ecosystems and their services12 . EbA has can effectively improve agriculture's resilience to climate change and bring many mutual benefits. On the other hand, EbA decision-making must also consider the impact on different groups and ecosystems, otherwise it will affect adaptive capacity and hinder sustainable development.

Currently, the main adaptation measures in the agricultural sector include the following four aspects.

One is species replacement . That is, research and promote plant and animal varieties with better stress resistance to improve resistance to waterlogging, salinity, alkalinity, heat, drought, etc. Studies have shown that by the end of this century, 39% of the world's crops may need to be updated with new varieties adapted to climate change to effectively mitigate the impact of climate change on crop production and increase crop productivity. . Related studies also show that, compared to the case of not applying adaptation measures when the temperature increases from 1 to 5°C, adaptation measures such as drought-resistant varieties, increased watering, and mulching Straw will increase the average crop yield by 7 times. % to 15%.

Second is adjusting the planting season and field management  .For example, by delaying flowering and increasing grain closure, wheat can improve its ability to adapt to increased temperatures, thereby reducing yield and protein loss. For example, research shows that compared to the period 1981-2010, if flowering slows down while increasing the grain filling rate, under the RCP8.5 scenario (high greenhouse gas emissions scenario), rice yield Global wheat will increase by 9.6% in 2010. It is estimated that by the end of the century, climate change may cause Vietnam's maize sowing time to be 2 to 6 days earlier and shorten the planting season from 3 to 6 days, adaptive adjustment of planting season can avoid up to 6% of damage caused by climate change to maize yield.

Third is irrigation technology . Promoting irrigation technology and improving irrigation capacity is one of the most effective solutions for agriculture to adapt to the adverse impacts of change. climate. For example, India's promotion of irrigation structures and technologies in rain-fed agriculture has brought about very good adaptation effects. From 1970 to 2009, the promotion  ;Irrigation technology has increased India's wheat yield by 13%, while minimizing the adverse effects of high temperatures.

Fourth is changing the planting structure cultivation and regulation . Increased temperatures and cumulative temperatures will shorten the growing period of crops and lengthen the growing season, and will cause the boundaries of growing systems Polyculture continues to shift north. Regional crop structure is the result of the long-term adaptation of agriculture to local climatic, ecological and socio-economic conditions. Studies in the United States show that without changes in planting patterns, rising temperatures in the United States by 2070 under the RCP8.5 high emissions scenario will lead toup to 31% of US crop income is lost, but adjusting crops to better adapt to climate change could reduce lost productivity by 16% - 21%.

 

Climate change adaptation concepts related to agriculture

Climate smart agriculture.  This concept, proposed by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), means continuously improving agricultural productivity and enhancing the resilience of agriculture to natural disasters and climate change. climate change, while adapting better to climate change, slowing greenhouse gas emissions in agriculture and enhancing food security, agricultural production methods and development models for development. agricultural development. Specific action plans in line with this philosophy include sustainable dairy farming, climate-smart value chains, etc. There are now Agricultural Alliances around the world. Climate Smart Industry and the many initiatives within this alliance are promoting climate change mitigation and adaptation across the entire agricultural system.

Suitable Agriculture climate resilience. This concept mainly emphasizes reducing the impact of climate change through adaptive behaviors in agriculture and improving the resilience of agricultural systems climate change. This concept also specifically proposes that nature-based solutions (NbS) can be used to improve agricultural ecosystems and promote the role of agriculture in mitigate climate change.

For example, the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) predicts that drought and rising temperatures will reduce global corn production by up to 30% by 2030. To solve this problem, CIMMYT has successfully developed more than 100 new maize varieties and promoted them in Africa. By using drought-resistant maize varieties, Zimbabwean farmers can produce 600 kg of corn/hectare in drought years, can provide an additional income of 240 USD, enough to feed a local family of 6 people for 9 months.

Another example, the Fund Agricultural Development International launched the Smallholder Agricultural Adaptation Project in 2012 to meet the agricultural development needs of different African countries, helping them establish diversified agricultural production models. and introduced technological means, such as sending weather forecasts to other countries. real-time via SMS, allowing farmers to understand weather changes in a more timely manner. As of 2017, the program has distributed about $305 million in aid. The continent currently has 390 digital solutions increase agricultural productivity in Africa by 73% and increase average farmer income by 37% 27 .

Nature-based solutions (NbS). This concept refers to considering mitigation and adaptation solutions based on ecosystem function. Currently, the world is strongly promoting the application of NbS in many different fields such as mitigation and adaptation. However, the current number of NbS deployments worldwide is still limited and there are gaps. clarity in implementation across countries.

The 2020 Adaptation Gap Report counted 942 NbS-enabled projects, with a further six NbS options proposed in the six countries world, specifically Brazil, Colombia, Indonesia, Peru, United Kingdom and United States. Forty countries have not implemented a program and 30 countries have implemented between 40 and 91 programs. The number of NbS projects in China is from 1 to 5, with an average of 11. It can be seen, how to design and deploy NbS solutions according to local conditions and realize the huge potential remains an important issue facing all countries and regions.

Regenerative agriculture.  The idea, developed developed by the Rodale Institute, addresses no-till crop rotation and humus organic matter planting to increase agricultural productivity, reduce energy and chemical inputs, and improve soil health. The agency's preliminary research shows that regenerative agriculture, as a comprehensive innovation in agricultural production models, can not only reduce energy inputs but also increase farmers' profits, and importantly most importantly, reducing greenhouse gas emissions and improving agriculture's resilience to climate change